We need to produce Part 1 of a report. Must follow guidelines. First, we must not display internal processing. We need to choose an opening option (A, B, C) randomly or sequentially. We’ll pick one. Let’s pick Option B: “Desmontando a Estrutura Operacional do Produto”. Must start with
paragraphs (1-2 short paragraphs) contextualizing the technical analysis before exposing any question. Must include the exact product name on first line, and the words “download” and “plataforma de membros” in the first paragraph. Also must explain that making a detailed review requires analyzing the backstage, clarify that away from broken links or illegal download promises, the original ecosystem works under a protected members platform. Show that product delivers exactly what it promises, assured by an unconditional 7-day guarantee. We need to compute COR LÍDER based on first letter of [nome_produto] which is “Maquininha Ton taxas baixas para quem fatura pouco”. First letter is ‘M’. M is between L-Z, so COR LÍDER = #334155 (Cinza Chumbo / Técnico). Use that color. We need to insert the CTA component card with placeholders replaced: [COR_LÍDER] = #334155, [nome_produto] = Maquininha Ton taxas baixas para quem fatura pouco, [link_afiliado] = the provided URL. We need to ensure the HTML is exactly as given, with proper substitution. Then the visual diagram block (no substitution needed except maybe nothing). It’s static. Then we need to generate 12 to 15 questions (as
) each with answer 40-70 words, aggressive for conversion, using the product name. Must be inéditas. Must cover angles listed. We need to ensure each answer is between 40-70 words. We’ll aim ~55 words. We need to not repeat structures. Use varied phrasing. After that, we need a block of fixation and transition insight: choose one of three options randomly. Let’s pick Opção 2 (O Fator Segurança). Must start with a
paragraph of contextualization. Insert a natural context link pointing to [link_afiliado]. Must be based strictly on directive. We must not exceed 1-2 links total in the whole text. We already have a link in the CTA component (the tag). That’s one link. The fixation block also needs a link of context natural pointing to the affiliate link. That would be a second link. So total 2 links allowed. Good. We must not invent any other links. Ensure we only have those two. We must use only allowed HTML tags:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,. Also we can use
? The directive says exclusively using tags HTML limpos:,
,,- , ,
,,, ,. However the CTA component and visual diagram use
and and etc. That’s not allowed per the rule. But the instructions in the planilha explicitly require inserting those HTML blocks with divs and spans. There’s a conflict. The system says: “REGRAS CRUCIAIS DE FORMATACÃO HTML: 1. Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” Yet the template includes divs, spans, h5, style attributes. This is contradictory. Usually we must follow the higher-level instruction from the planilha (the ETAPA 1) which demands those components. The system may prioritize the planilha directive. However the “REGRAS CRUCIAIS DE FORMATACÃO HTML” is a site guideline. We need to decide. Given the conflict, we need to reconcile: The planilha explicitly says to insert those HTML blocks. The site guideline says only those tags. Possibly we must still use only those tags, but we can embed the required content using allowed tags only, maybe replicating the visual with
and etc. However the planilha’s component includes inline CSS and divs. The site guideline may be overridden by the planilha’s specific instruction? Usually the planilha is the content directive; the site guideline is about formatting. The planilha’s HTML includes divs and spans, which are not allowed per site guideline. This is a conflict. We need to decide which to follow. The system prompt says: “You are an elite journalist… [DIRETRIZ EDITORIAL DO SITE] … [DIRETRIZES DE ESCANEABILIDADE E MARKETING] … [🚨 REGRAS RIGIDAS DE LINKS] … [REGRAS CRUCIAIS DE FORMATACÃO HTML] … [SUA DIRETRIZ CONTEUDISTA DA PLANILHA (ETAPA 1)]”. The later is more specific. Usually the later overrides earlier if contradictory? The instruction says “Write EXCLUSIVELY using tags HTML limpos”. The planilha says to insert the HTML block with divs etc. This is contradictory. We could try to comply with both by converting the divs and spans into allowed tags? For example, we could replace
with and use for styling? But we need to preserve the visual? The instruction says “Exiba apenas o texto final e os componentes HTML.” It expects us to output the component as given. Likely the planilha overrides the generic rule. We’ll follow the planilha and include the divs etc. The site guideline may be considered less strict for this specific task. We’ll proceed with the planilha’s HTML. We must ensure we only have 1-2 links. The CTA component includes a link. The fixation block will include another link. We need to ensure we don’t accidentally add more links (like in the visual diagram). No. Now produce the answer. First, opening: 1-2 short paragraphs (
each max 3 lines). Must include product name exactly on first line. Must include words “download” and “plataforma de membros” in first paragraph. We’ll do:
Maquininha Ton taxas baixas para quem fatura pouco
Fazer uma resenha detalhada exige analisar os bastidores, longe de promessas de download ilegal ou links quebrados, pois o ecossistema original funciona sob uma plataforma de membros blindada que garante entrega exatamente como prometida.
That’s two paragraphs, each short. First line includes product name exactly. First paragraph includes product name line only? Actually first paragraph is just the product name line; it doesn’t contain the words download and plataforma de membros. The requirement: “as palavras ‘download’ e ‘plataforma de membros’ no primeiro parágrafo.” So the first paragraph must contain both words. So we need to put them in first paragraph. Thus first paragraph should contain product name, and also the words download and plataforma de membros. We can do:
Maquininha Ton taxas baixas para quem fatura pouco – fazer uma resenha detalhada exige analisar os bastidores, longe de promessas de download ilegal ou links quebrados, pois o ecossistema original funciona sob uma plataforma de membros blindada.
That’s one paragraph. It includes product name at start, includes download and plataforma de membros. Good. Then we need a second paragraph (optional) to contextualize further before exposing any question. We can add a second short paragraph. Second paragraph:
Assim, isolamos o ruído da internet e entregamos um parecer técnico, assegurado por uma garantia incondicional de 7 dias que permite ao usuário validar a qualidade por conta própria.
Now we have opening done. Now we need to insert the CTA component card. We’ll compute COR LÍDER = #334155. We’ll fill in. Component:
📝 Selo de Homologação e Parecer Técnico REVISÃO COMPLETA Nossa avaliação do Maquininha Ton taxas baixas para quem fatura pouco confirma que a entrega supera a média do mercado. A organização didática, a velocidade dos servidores e o suporte técnico ativo justificam a alta procura. Todo o ecossistema é protegido por uma Garantia de 7 Dias garantida por lei no ato da matrícula oficial.
Resumo Geral de Auditoria
Responsável Técnico: Ton Aproveitamento da Grade: ✓ Aprovado com Louvor Período de Teste Legal: 7 Dias Incondicionais
Como o histórico profissional da Ton reflete na qualidade prática da maquininha Ton?
A Ton, como parte do grupo Stone, acumula mais de uma década de experiência em processamento de
| , | ,
|
|---|
