We need to produce a block of HTML content following strict rules. We must start with
paragraph of contextualization, then proceed. Must not include any intro or headings before that. Use only allowed tags:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,. No markdown, no H1, no other tags. Must include at most 1-2 links (anchor tags) with exact URL from affiliate link. Must not invent domains. Must embed the link(s) using the exact URL: https://calculadorajuros.online/. Must obey link rules: up to 2 links, must be exact URL. We must follow editorial entry: start with 1-2 short paragraphs in
tags contextualizing the technical analysis before exposing any question. So first
should be contextualization, then we can have other paragraphs, headings etc. We need to answer the product: “Cálculo de saldo devedor,” but it’s about the calculator. The article should be about the product, focusing on Knowledge Graph etc. However we must follow the provided editorial directives and the “planilha” instructions for the article. It wants a highly structured article about the product, with title_conteudo, dados_tecnicos and link_afiliado. But we must produce a block based on those directives. We must include a direct answer in first two paragraphs (direct answer & AEO) with short opening phrase max 50 characters. Use short sentences to capture featured snippets. We must use human, direct, skeptical tone. We must not use any intro or empty headings. We must obey formatting: only allowed tags. We must include at most 2 anchor tags. Probably we will include one link to the affiliate URL. We must not use any other tags like
,, etc. Only is allowed. Use for subheadings. We need to include a FAQ section with questions extracted from “People Also Ask”. Use maybe for each question? But we can include tags for each question? The directive says “Respostas Rápidas (Estilo People Also Ask): Insira uma seção respondendo diretamente e em 1-2 frases as dúvidas mais comuns”. Could use for each question? Probably okay. We need to include tables comparatives maybe using
etc. We need to include bullet lists using- . We must keep paragraphs short, max 3 lines. We must not use markdown formatting. We must not use any other tags. We must embed the link exactly as given. We need to include up to 2 links. We can include one link to the affiliate site, maybe also a link to some other resource but must be exact URL; we only have one URL provided. So we can include just that one link. We must ensure we don’t exceed 2 links. We must not invent generic domains. We must not use any other HTML tags besides allowed ones. We must start with a
paragraph of contextualization. Let’s craft: First
maybe: “Ao analisar a Calculadora de Juros Online, verificamos seu papel como ferramenta de simulação financeira rápida.” That’s a short paragraph. Then we need to give direct answer in first two paragraphs. So maybe second paragraph: “Ela entrega cálculos de juros, parcelas e saldo devedor em segundos, sem login.” That’s short. We need to answer what the product delivers, who it’s for, who it’s not for, and the transformation. We need to keep each paragraph short (max 3 lines). Use
tags. We can have multiple
tags. We need to include
headings for sections. We need to include a table maybe comparing pros and cons? Use
. We need to include a FAQ section with questions and answers maybe in
. We need to include bullet lists. We need to include a link to affiliate site using Calculadora de Juros Online. We must ensure we only use up to 2 links; we will use just one. Now let’s craft content. Structure:
contextualization paragraph.
direct answer paragraph(s) with short opening phrase <=50 chars. Something like "Resposta direta: Sim, calcula saldo devedor em segundos." That's under 50 chars? Let's count: "Resposta direta: Sim, calcula saldo devedor em segundos." That's 49 characters maybe. Good. But we need to answer what the product delivers, for whom, who it's not for, transformation. Could be in two short paragraphs. Paragraph 1: "Resposta direta: Sim, calcula saldo devedor em segundos." That's short. Paragraph 2: "Ideal para quem precisa comparar juros antes de fechar crédito. Não serve para quem busca aprovação automática de empréstimo." That's also short. Then we can have
sections: “Prós principais”, “Contras reais”, “FAQ rápido”, “Como usar”, etc. We need to include a table maybe with pros and cons. We need to include bullet lists. We need to include a link. We must not exceed 2 links. We must keep paragraphs short. We must not use any other tags. Let’s draft. First
contextualization:
A Calculadora de Juros Online funciona como um simulador financeiro acessível diretamente no navegador, permitindo ao usuário inserir dados como capital, taxa e prazo para obter juros, parcelas e saldo devedor.
Then direct answer paragraphs:
Resposta direta: Sim, calcula saldo devedor em segundos.
Ideal para quem quer comparar cenários de financiamento antes de assinar contrato. Não substitui a proposta oficial de banco.
Now maybe a heading
Prós e Contras
then a table with two columns? Use
withPrós Contras and list items? Could use
inside cells? Might be messy. Simpler: use after. But we need to keep paragraphs short. We can have a of pros and another of cons. But we need to keep them separate maybe within? Actually
is a block element, can be placed after a. We can have:
Prós
- Cálculo online e instantâneo
- Simulação de SAC e Price
… etc.
Then
Contras
- Não inclui tarifas ou seguros
…
We need to include a table maybe for comparative with competitors? Could include a simple table with three columns: “Ferramenta”, “Preço”, “Principais recursos”. Use
. We can include a link to affiliate site within that table maybe. We must ensure we only use up to 2 links; we can embed the link in the table cell. Let’s embed the link as anchor around the site name. We need to ensure the anchor uses the exact URL. We can do: Calculadora de Juros Online Now include a table:Ferramenta Preço Destaque Calculadora de Juros Online Gratuita Simulação SAC x Price Calculadora do Cidadão Gratuita Dados do BC
That’s a comparative table with 2 rows, includes one link. Now FAQ section: Use
Perguntas frequentes
then maybe each question as
? But we already used for headings; we can reuse for each question. That’s okay. We need to answer each in 1-2 sentences. We can include three questions: “Tem garantia?” “Como é o acesso?” “Funciona para iniciantes?” Provide short answers. We can format asTem garantia?
Não há garantia de resultados, apenas simulação.
etc. But we must keep paragraphs short. Now we need to include a blockquote maybe for citation? Could include a
with a citation about the limitation. We can include a
with the content from “ponto_de_verdade” maybe. Now ensure we don’t exceed 2 links; we have one link already. Could add another link maybe to some source, but must be exact URL; we only have one provided. So we can keep just one. Now ensure we use only allowed tags. We must not use any other tags like maybe allowed; we can use for emphasis. We need to keep each paragraph max 3 lines; but we can just keep short. Now let’s craft final output. We’ll start with
contextualization. Then direct answer paragraphs. Then maybe
Prós
and
. ThenContras
and
. ThenComparativo rápido
and
. ThenPerguntas frequentes
with Q&A. Then maybe a
with citation. Then a final CTA maybe with link again? But we already used link; we can add a second link? Not needed. But we must include a CTA after breaking objections (price, guarantee, support). The directive says to indicate exact location of purchase buttons after breaking critical objections. We can add a
with a link again? But we cannot exceed 2 links; we already used 1. We could add a second link
| , | ,
|
|---|
