We need to produce an HTML article following strict rules. Must start with
contextualizing before any title. Must not use headings except
later. Must not use. Must use only allowed tags:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,. Must embed up to 1-2 links total, using exact URL provided: https://calculadorajuros.online/. Must not invent other domains. Must keep density editorial with microparagraphs max 3 lines. Must use short sentences. Must start with
contextualizing, then later include
maybe for sections. Must not use bullet lists? We can use- . Must embed up to 2 links. Probably include link to site at some point. Must obey link rules: at most 1-2 links, must use exactly the URL given. So we can include one link somewhere. Must not invent generic domains. We need to produce article about “Calculadora de financiamento de moto” based on data. Focus on people who already bought or have technical doubts. Terms: “Como acessar”, “Plataforma”, “Como pedir reembolso”. Must include those terms? Possibly. We need to follow the editorial directives: start with
contextualizing, then later include
headings. Must not start with. Must not use markdown. We must keep paragraphs short, max 3 lines. Use
tags only for paragraphs. Use for emphasis. Use
- for lists. We must include FAQ maybe? But must keep within allowed tags. Could include
for sections like “Respostas rápidas”. Use for FAQ? Might be okay. We must embed up to 2 links; we can include one link to the site somewhere, maybe at end as CTA. Must use exactly the URL: https://calculadorajuros.online/. So link tag: Calculadora de Juros Online. We must not use any other link. We must not use, only. Use for subtitles. We must not use any other tags besides allowed ones. We must not use any extra formatting like bold? We can use . That’s allowed. We must not use any extra commentary. We need to produce a block that begins with a contextualizing. Then likely an
for direct answer. Then other sections. We need to include the direct answer in first two paragraphs (the opening). Must give verdict: what the tool delivers, who it’s for, who it’s not for, transformation. Use short sentences, max 50 characters at beginning? It says “Use frases curtas (máx. 50 caracteres no início) para capturar Featured Snippets”. So the first sentence should be short, <=50 characters. Let's craft: "Calcula juros e financiamentos em segundos." That's 38 characters maybe. That's okay. We need to answer what the course delivers? Actually it's a calculator, not a course. But they refer to "produto sua base são sos titulo_conteudo, dados_tecnicos e link_afiliado." They talk about "curso"? Might be misapplied. But we need to talk about the product as a tool. We must include terms "Como acessar", "Plataforma", "Como pedir reembolso". Probably we need to mention these terms in the content. We must not use any extra headings besides. Could have “Respostas rápidas”. Use for list of FAQ. We must keep each paragraph max 3 lines; but we can just keep short paragraphs. We must not use any extra formatting like bullet points outside- . That’s fine. We must include up to 2 links; we will include one link maybe at the end as CTA. Must not exceed 2. We must not use any other links. We must not use any other domains. We must not use any other tags. We must not use any markdown. Now craft the content. Structure: First
contextualizing: talk about need to know cost of financing a motorcycle, need quick calculations. Then maybe
“Veredito direto” (but must be tag). The first paragraph after contextualizing could be the direct answer? Actually we need to start with
contextualizing, then later we can have
for sections. The direct answer should be in first 2 paragraphs, but they must be
tags. So we can have two
paragraphs after the initial contextualizing
? The instruction: “Resposta Direta & AEO (Abertura Sem Fruffru): Dê o veredito definitivo nos 2 primeiros parágrafos.” So the first two paragraphs after the opening contextualizing should contain the direct answer. Actually they say “iniciando obrigatoriamente com a abertura de um parágrafo
de contextualização.” So we start with a
contextualizing. Then we need to give direct answer in the next two paragraphs (still
). So we will have three
in a row: first contextualizing, second maybe direct answer part 1, third direct answer part 2. Then we can have
sections. Thus structure:
Contextualizing sentence about need to know cost.
Short verdict sentence (<=50 chars).
Answer: who it’s for, who not, transformation.
Then maybe
“Como acessar” etc. We need to include terms “Como acessar”, “Plataforma”, “Como pedir reembolso” somewhere in the text. We can include them in a paragraph or list. We must keep each paragraph short, max 3 lines. We’ll keep each
short. We can include a
list of pros/cons maybe later. We must include up to 2 links; we can place the link after the “Acesse agora” maybe. We must ensure we only use allowed tags. We must not use inside headings? It’s allowed. We must not use any extra tags. Now craft content. Paragraph 1 (contextualizing): maybe “Ao financiar uma moto, o custo total depende de juros, prazo e sistema de amortização.” That’s short. Paragraph 2 (direct answer first part): “Calcula juros e parcelas em segundos.” That’s <=50 chars? Let's count: "Calcula juros e parcelas em segundos." That's 33 characters including spaces? Let's count: C(1)a2l3c4u5l6a7 (space8)j9u10r11o12s13 (space14)e15 (space16)p17a18r19c20e21l22a23s24 (space25)e26m27 (space28)s29e30g31u32n33d34o35s36. Actually 36 characters. Good. Paragraph 3 (direct answer second part): "Serve quem quer comparar SAC x Price e entender o custo real." That's longer but okay. Must be short sentences, max 3 lines. It's okay. Now after that we can have “Como acessar a plataforma”. Then maybe a
explaining steps: “Acesse o site, escolha ‘Financiamento de moto’, insira dados e obtenha a tabela.” That’s a paragraph. Then maybe
“Prós e contras”. Use- to list. We need to include pros and cons as list items. We must keep each
- short. We can include up to 2 links; maybe include link to site at the end as CTA: Calcular agora. That’s one link. We must not exceed 2 links; we can just use one. We must not use any other links. Now include FAQ section with
“Perguntas frequentes”. Use- for each question and answer maybe as separate
- but answer may be longer; but we can embed
inside
- ? Not allowed? We can just put the answer as part of the
- text; it’s okay. But we need to keep each paragraph within
. If we use
- items, they can contain text but not separate
tags? It’s okay to have text inside
- . We can have multiple
- items. We must not use
more than needed. Now include terms “Como pedir reembolso”? Maybe not relevant; but we can mention “Como pedir reembolso” maybe not needed. But the directive says focus: “Termos: “Como acessar , “Plataforma, “Como pedir reembolso.” So we need to include these terms somewhere. Probably in a paragraph about access and refunds? There’s no refund for a free calculator, but we can mention “Como pedir reembolso” maybe as a note about guarantee? Could be irrelevant but we must include the term. We can add a paragraph: “Não há reembolso porque não há pagamento.” But we need to include phrase “Como pedir reembolso”. Could phrase: “Como pedir reembolso? Não se aplica a ferramentas gratuitas.” That includes the term. We must keep it short. Now ensure we don’t exceed link limit. We’ll have only one link. Now produce final HTML. Let’s draft:
Ao financiar uma moto, o custo total depende de juros, prazo e sistema de amortização.
Calcula juros e parcelas em segundos.
Serve quem quer comparar SAC x Price e entender o custo real. Não serve para
| , | ,
|
|---|
